Its parent company's history warrants suspicion; our previous tests have actually revealed it to expose your
best VPN services use to your ISP; its website and app trackers are more numerous than required; and its ad-blocker utilizes an untrustworthy method of traffic adjustment no VPN ought to even believe about. Its low rate formerly made it worth thinking about if you needed to change the appearance of your place online, however not if you wanted best-in-class security.
I also suggest anybody in the US examines CyberGhost's parent company prior to deciding whether to pay for a subscription. On the plus side, nevertheless, CyberGhost is still faster than Norton Secure VPN and was less taxing on my device's processing power during screening. It also provides split-tunneling in its Windows client and has its servers nicely organized into easy to use categories: NoSpy servers, servers tailored for torrenting, servers best for streaming and servers best for usage with a static IP address.
Norton Secure VPN does not support P2P or BitTorrent, it does not have a kill switch function, and it does not support Linux, routers or set top boxes. Its Netflix and streaming compatibility is rather limited. Even even worse, during testing, we experienced privacy-compromising information leaks. During CNET's screening, Norton Secure VPN speeds were equivalent to other mid-tier VPNs but not particularly competitive.