The US is somewhat of a "free" country and nobody said you forced them to vote for the elephant in the room. Your initial presentation was to persuade people to your supposition - ie. support Joseph Smith. But alas, you still don't get it! I can't say for other members, but I'm laughing at your profound stupidity in evidences presentation and your moronic naivety overall. Your arguments in support of Dumbo is severely skewed to the extreme point of undermining your own credibility.
1) "Ḿnh viết cái này là theo sự thật" - truth is in the eye of the beholder. Data is only just that ... data. No black or white. The problem is man.
A) Yes,the National Defense Authorization Act, NDAA, was signed and has become effective. But unlike the Act, your supportive points clearly indicate a bunch of malarkey (Ha...Ha...Ha) and your amateurish comprehension of basic jurisprudence in the US. As stated earlier, Sub Section 1201 has already had several defeats against it w/ a permanent injunction of this section on 09/2012, but an appeal has already been filed w/ the Circuit Court of Appeals. If my memory is correct, the ACLU was one organization, among many other plaintiffs, that filed briefs against this Section. The Supreme Court will probably takes up the matter? How about them truth? See the forest and not just the trees! But you still ignore the facts. Oh well ... I guess I can't teach Dumbo new trick. Will a jack-ass in the room fare any better? Hmm ... doubt it.
B) "Chứ ḿnh không có bia đặt chuyện ok. Các bạn không tin th́ cứ theo những links ḿnh đưa mà tự t́m hiểu." - ibidiem ... see the forest and not just the trees young Grasshopper. It's not the data that we questions, its your selective narrow mindedness in presenting other data, supportive or not. That's what you call a spin ... Dam! That selective retrograde amnesia can be a bitch!
C) As to your other self destructive supporting points, ROFL & LMFAO since you obviously can't defend those other laughable bovine excrement points neither.
D) My advice - go back to school, learn some critical thinking and how to analyze basic evidence. You did go to college? Or maybe an applied/associative trade school? Oh what the hell am I talking to, you're probably fuming at the oral cavity now .... just go home, get some milk and learn something from your mom. She can enlighten you.
2) "Nếu các bạn chửi hoặc thóa mạ ḿnh, th́ ḿnh sẽ REPORT TO ADMIN. Nếu ADMIN KHÔNG LÀM THEO LUẬT, th́ ḿnh sẽ chửi lại ok." - following true to form and like a child who doesn't get his way, having to resort to an emotional response and now being a snitch and then threatening retaliation. Seriously, this "God of Encoder" is what you wanted ? A little emperor in the room? Oops! Sorry, wrong age. It's Honey Boo Boo.
A) Grow up! No need to proclaim it. Just Do It!
3) One very basic observation b/w our clashes - way too emotional and w/ emotions hindering basic logic. May I suggest you get an appointment ASAP w/ one of those MD, preferably one that has privileges at the local psych ward and probably easier on the pocket too, that is leaving medical practice to help you manage those emotions? Seriously, "75% bác sĩ cùng nhau bỏ nghề"? That's one of your supporting points? Get your head out of your own ass and think! Don't do it! UPS is only asking a penny increase?
4) I'll throw you a life preserver - nobody is buying your "Made in China" arguments pertaining to this thread. So what, members made you look like a foolish dog wagging its tail for some treats. Drop it and people will forget. You are in the position of "have you stop beating up your wife lately"?
Reference "Thôi các bạn bảo trọng..GOOD BYE !!", like most politician & CSVN ......
U . R . A ... H Y P O C R I T E ... O K ?
|